JQRP is committed to maintaining integrity, transparency, fairness, accountability, and responsible scholarly communication throughout the publishing process.
These principles apply to authors, reviewers, editors, editorial board members, and other participants involved in the publication process of JQRP publications.
JQRP is committed to promoting ethical and responsible scholarly publishing. Manuscripts and other scholarly contributions should represent original academic work and should be prepared and submitted in accordance with accepted standards of research integrity.
The publisher, editors, reviewers, and authors share responsibility for maintaining the integrity of the scholarly record.
Authors are responsible for ensuring the accuracy, originality, integrity, and ethical presentation of their submitted work.
Reviewers contribute to the quality and integrity of scholarly publishing by providing objective and constructive assessments of submitted manuscripts.
Editors are responsible for managing the editorial process fairly and maintaining appropriate standards of academic integrity.
JQRP does not support plagiarism, fabrication, falsification, unauthorized duplication, or other forms of academic misconduct.
Submitted manuscripts may be examined for textual similarity and other indicators of potential academic misconduct. Where concerns arise, the matter may be investigated in accordance with applicable editorial procedures.
Authors, reviewers, editors, and other participants in the publication process should disclose circumstances that could reasonably be perceived as influencing their scholarly or editorial judgment.
Where a conflict could compromise impartiality, appropriate steps may be taken, including reassignment of editorial or review responsibilities.
Concerns relating to fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, authorship disputes, duplicate publication, manipulation of the peer-review process, or other forms of publication misconduct may be considered by the appropriate editorial authority.
Where necessary, JQRP may request supporting information or documentation and may take appropriate corrective action based on the circumstances of the case.
JQRP recognizes the importance of maintaining an accurate scholarly record.
Where a material error is identified after publication, appropriate editorial action may include a correction, clarification, expression of concern, or retraction, depending on the nature and significance of the issue.
Editorial actions will be documented as appropriate to maintain transparency in the scholarly record.
Authors and other participants may raise legitimate concerns regarding editorial or publication processes through the appropriate communication channels.
Complaints and appeals should provide sufficient information to enable the matter to be reviewed fairly and appropriately.
JQRP seeks to address legitimate concerns in a timely, transparent, and professional manner.
Originality, accurate reporting, appropriate attribution, authorship transparency, and disclosure of relevant conflicts.
Confidential, objective, constructive, and impartial evaluation of submitted scholarly work.
Fair editorial decision-making, confidentiality, appropriate peer review, and management of ethical concerns.
For questions or concerns relating to publication ethics, scholarly integrity, or publication practices, please contact JURIS QUANTUM RESEARCH AND PUBLICATIONS.
Email: operations@jurisquantum.com